Less is More (Collectibles in Video Games)

So I've been playing a lot of Assassin's Creed 2 recently, I bought it and played it recently (As part of a winter sale at a store), and I'm enjoying it a lot more than the first Assassin's Creed, which I quit half-way through because I was tired of hiding amongst wandering crows of priests and an extremely bland environment. It became very boring, very quickly.

Out of the things Assassin's Creed 2 does a lot better than the first, I think one prominent spot is in it's collectibles.

Now I'm not someone who desires to collect every achievement in every game, as most of the games I've played range from 250-750 in number of points I have collected, so achievements have never really provided me the drive to collect thousands of out of the way items. This is where Assassin's Creed 2 really shines.

The Codex Pages give you health bar upgrades for every 4th page you decode. The Glyphs each have interesting puzzles for you to solve and are located on or near famous landmarks which your quests often take you on or near. Between the two of them, each rewards you with additional story bits, The Glyphs combine to create a hidden scene that has story implications, and the same goes for when all of the codex pages are gathered together to create a secret picture of some sort for more story implications.


I'm a drug fiend big fan of story telling and additional pieces of fiction that fit into the overall story of a game, Mass Effect 2's own Codex Entries are an example, so for me, this seems like a much larger reward than intangible points. As well, between Glyphs and Codex Pages, there aren't too many of either, making it much easier to collect both of them than the typical 100+ collectibles in other games. Now I'm not saying that the system is perfect, There are 100 feathers in the game you can collect, which as far as I know don't provide much of a reward, but the game does a much better job of implementing collectibles than some other games.

So all I'm saying, is it doesn't take many collectibles to make the system good, in fact it doesn't take many, size doesn't matter and bigger isn't necessarily better in this case. A decent sized amount of collectibles for each world/level which are generally easy to find and have some reward beyond just achievement points. now of course this can be changed, say in a game like Fallout or Dragon Age, you could have a smaller amount of harder to find or collect objects which could unlock a power piece of weaponry or armor.

What seems to be the optimal method of collectible items or such in games is that the amount of collectibles is equal to or less than the value of the rewards it provides, as well as being placed in interesting areas that you are likely to visit either on account of the gameplay or the world/level's beauty.

Why "Laser Bee"

Well, Laser Bee, why the name? Let me explain.

To begin with, it sounds catchy, and i liked the ring to it, it seemed fairly original to it. I got my inspiration from such sites as Giant Bomb and Games Radar, a simple two word name.

As for the next reason, it's pretty basic, a bee made of concentrated light would be pretty awesome. You already have Honey Bees, followed by Killer Bees, and then you have the boss-type Laser Bees. They would probably be in the futuristic level, or the time-travel level.

Also, getting a symbol of some kind of high-tech bee, or a bee mounted with laser cannons would be pretty intriguing in terms of it's design.

Really, I just like the originality of it, and as I'm somewhat anxious in writing publicly for the first few times, and I have a fear of bees, you could draw some form of psychological conclusion.